Download the full Catha guide

Keep the complete branded version for internal review and implementation.

Download the full PDF

Construction Applications

Measure factual accuracy, completeness, source grounding, format compliance, false confidence, exception handling and whether a qualified reviewer can efficiently verify the result.

CATHA PRACTICAL AI FOR CONSTRUCTION LIBRARY Trust, But Test Construction AI How to Evaluate AI Before It Runs Construction Workflows Guide 8
Best use Build a test set before production. Measure success, failure and uncertainty against ground truth and business consequences.
LayerWhat to test
Model/output qualityAccuracy, completeness, relevance, groundedness
Workflow qualityCorrect routing, tool selection, state handling
Safety/controlPermissions, prohibited actions, escalation
Operational reliabilityLatency, retries, duplicate prevention, outage behavior
Economic performanceCost per successful outcome, human review burden
Human usabilityClarity, trust, adoption, correction effort
MetricPilot thresholdProduction threshold
Critical factual accuracyDefineDefine
Unsupported claimsDefine maxLower max
Correct escalationDefineNear-100% for high-risk cases
Duplicate external actions00
Unauthorized actions00
Human correction timeTargetTarget
Cost/successful caseTargetTarget
CheckItemNotes
☐Test suite reruns after prompt changes____________________________
☐Rerun after model changes____________________________
☐Rerun after tool/API changes____________________________
☐Compare new vs. prior version____________________________
☐Block release on critical regressions____________________________
☐Retain failing examples for future tests____________________________
Golden rule If a system can create consequential business effects, evaluation must test the full workflow – not just whether the model writes a convincing answer.