Put the right human at the right decision.
No technical background required. Use it with your leadership or operations team.
Download the PDFReview questions
- Is the reviewer qualified to judge the output?
- Can the reviewer see the source evidence?
- Is review required before an external or authoritative action?
- Does the reviewer have enough time to perform meaningful review?
- Are contractual, pricing, payment and safety decisions explicitly retained by people?
- Is there a clear escalation path when the AI is uncertain?
Construction decision rule
Use the least expensive, least privileged and least complex AI approach that can reliably improve the construction outcome. Increase intelligence, access or autonomy only when measured evidence shows the simpler approach is insufficient.
How to use this download
Work through the questions using one real construction workflow. Do not score the company in the abstract. The purpose is to identify the next practical decision, not to justify AI where it does not belong.
Practical questions construction owners ask.
Who should review AI output in a construction workflow?
A reviewer who is qualified to judge the output, can see the source evidence and has enough time to perform meaningful review.
When is human review required?
Before an external or authoritative action, and contractual, pricing, payment and safety decisions should be explicitly retained by people.
What happens when the AI is uncertain?
There should be a clear escalation path to a person.
Keep reading
Use AI where it creates value. Govern it everywhere it acts.
Catha helps construction companies identify, build and manage AI workflows while keeping business authority in human hands.